Modern hiking leans heavily on electronics. Phones handle navigation, weather, photography and communication, power banks extend their usefulness, solar panels promise independence, and PLBs sit underneath all of it as a last-line safety net. The trouble starts when these tools get treated as substitutes for one another instead of parts of a layered system.
Electronics redundancy isn’t about carrying more devices. It’s about understanding which tools fail first, which ones fail quietly, and which ones must work when everything else does not.
Start with the failure chain
Every electronic system has a predictable failure path, and it pays to know it before you’re relying on it.
Phones fail first. They rely on rechargeable lithium-ion batteries, constant user interaction, and software stability, and heat, cold, background signal searching, and continuous GPS use all accelerate battery drain. Power banks fail next: they extend phone runtime but share the same battery chemistry, so they’re vulnerable to cold, physical damage, port failure, and simple depletion. Solar panels fail situationally, because they depend on sunlight, orientation, time, and discipline, and in forested terrain, poor weather, or short winter days, their output can drop to near zero. PLBs sit outside the rechargeable-power chain entirely. They are not designed for convenience or daily use, and their dedicated battery, single-purpose controls and independent distress network remove several dependencies shared by phones and rechargeable communicators.
A good system accepts this hierarchy instead of fighting it, which is easier to see laid out.
The reliability pyramid
| Layer | Device | Primary failure mode | Role in the system |
| Top | Phone | Software, heat, cold, battery drain | Daily navigation, photos, planning |
| Middle | Power bank | Depletion, port or cable failure | Endurance and runtime |
| Supplement | Solar | Weather, terrain, time | Slows depletion, not replacement |
| Bottom | PLB | Deployment, damage, battery expiry, terrain or user error | Emergency life-saving |
| Outside system | Map and compass | Damage, loss, outdated mapping or insufficient skill | Total system fallback |
Where satellite communicators and GPS devices fit
Plenty of hikers also carry satellite communicators and dedicated GPS units, and it’s worth being clear that these don’t sit outside the failure chain above, they sit inside it. Satellite communicators improve communication reliability and add two-way messaging, tracking and SOS cancellation, but they still rely on rechargeable lithium-ion batteries, software, and charging cables. From a redundancy perspective they sit between the phone and the PLB, better suited than a phone to communication beyond mobile coverage, but dependent on battery condition, satellite visibility and eligible service in ways a PLB is not.
Dedicated GPS devices often offer better battery efficiency, physical buttons, and improved reception under canopy, and they’re excellent navigation tools, but they still depend on rechargeable power, ports, and cables. They replace or supplement a phone as a navigation tool, rather than adding a genuinely new redundancy layer. Both device types increase capability and resilience, but neither removes the need for power management or an independent emergency beacon.
Service status is another potential failure point, and an easy one to overlook. A satellite communicator should not be assumed to retain SOS capability simply because it powers on or still displays an SOS control. Most devices require an activated, eligible satellite service. Some compatible Garmin inReach devices can retain SOS when correctly placed on Garmin’s specific Suspend Plan, but this exception does not apply to every model or inactive account. Cancelled, deactivated, never-activated and unsupported devices should not be relied upon for satellite SOS. Confirm the service status shown for your device, synchronise it after account changes, and test it before every remote trip.
Building the system, layer by layer
The phone: your most capable, least reliable tool
Your phone is the most capable device you carry, and it’s also the least reliable one over multiple days, so treat it as high-value but fragile. Use flight mode when navigating, minimise background apps, and avoid charging while actively using GPS, because charging a phone while navigating generates heat, which degrades batteries and wastes energy. If your phone battery reaches zero, your hike becomes less convenient, not automatically dangerous. Even if your phone is rated “waterproof”, charging it while the port is damp from humidity or rain can cause short-circuiting or permanent port corrosion.
The power bank: buying endurance, not unlimited power
A power bank exists to keep the phone useful, not to create unlimited power. The most common failure point is not the battery capacity, it’s the charging cable or port. A single frayed cable can turn a fully charged power bank into dead weight, so carry a spare cable and store it in a separate dry bag. Disconnect cables when not in use, as some power banks slowly drain if a cable remains plugged in. Charge devices during long breaks or at camp rather than while walking, which improves efficiency and reduces heat stress.
Solar: a trickle, not a foundation
Solar is optional, not foundational. For most trips under seven days, a larger power bank is lighter, simpler, and more reliable than a solar setup. Small panels attached to packs often underperform due to shade, angle, and movement. Solar works best as a trickle input on long trips with consistent sun exposure. It slows battery depletion but rarely replaces stored power.
The PLB: the backstop that has to work
A PLB does not extend phone battery life. It does not help with navigation or convenience. Its role is simple: provide an independent distress-alerting option when rechargeable communication and navigation systems are unavailable. Because it uses a sealed long-life battery, a dedicated distress frequency and no commercial subscription, it sits outside the rechargeable-device and service-plan failure chain, though it must still be undamaged, within its battery expiry date, correctly deployed and given the clearest available view of the sky. That independence is why redundancy-focused hikers still carry one even when using phones, power banks, and solar.
Analog redundancy: the layer that needs no power at all
True redundancy includes tools that do not rely on electricity at all. A protected paper map and compass require no electrical power and can remain usable after total electronic failure. They are the only navigation tools that remain usable if every electronic layer fails simultaneously. Electronics should assist your thinking, not replace it.
Discipline matters more than gear
Many system failures happen before the hike even begins. Confirm power bank charge level, test charging cables, check phone battery health, and run a PLB self-test at the trailhead rather than assuming everything’s ready. Assuming a device is charged is one of the most common failure points in multi-day systems, and it’s entirely avoidable.
Redundancy is about independence, not duplication
Carrying two phones is not redundancy if both rely on the same charger. Carrying a power bank and a phone is not redundancy if losing a cable makes both useless. True redundancy means different battery chemistries, different failure modes, and different purposes: phones provide capability, power banks provide duration, solar provides opportunity, and PLBs provide survival margin. They are not interchangeable.
Electronics planning for hiking was never really about staying connected. It’s about staying functional when conditions deteriorate, which means building the system from the bottom up, protecting the tools that must work when nothing else does, and accepting that the convenience layers, the phone, the power bank, the solar panel, will be the first things to fail. Used for what each is actually designed to do, redundancy becomes simple, logical and calm rather than heavy or excessive.




Thanks Darren, this is a great read about tech on the trail!
Also, I find it reassuring as it’s pretty much how I approach the technology I take with me.
It is always comforting to know I have a trusty paper map and compass in my kit if all the batteries run out (or otherwise expire…)!
Thanks Jason, really appreciate you saying that and I’m equally pleased to hear of your approach. It is comforting to know, and I think that comfort goes a long way to enjoying our time on the tracks.